Build on some simple and powerful principles :
-
Universal phonological system
-
Phonetic language
-
Rich, differenced and extensible lexicon
-
Simple and rigorous grammatical system
-
Strong and unambiguous expressiveness
-
Flexible and varied using
1)
An universal phonological system
Kotava has a simple and flexible
phonological system, restricted to the
5 basic vowels, 17 consonnants that are used in almost
every language, and 3 semi-vowels.
5
vowels : |
A, E, I, O, U |
|
17
consonnants : |
Bilabial |
B, P |
Swishing |
J, C |
Dental |
D, T |
Labiodental |
V, F |
Velar |
G, K |
Hissing |
Z, S |
Liquid |
L, R |
Nasal |
M, N |
Guttural |
X |
|
3
semi-vowels : |
H, W, Y |
As for the vowels Kotava
doesn't make, for instance, any distinction between brief
and long vowels, though brief forms are more usual.
Also, they can be pronounced more or less closed
(typical case of the « o »). Kotava doesn't use
nasal vowels either.
About the consonants, they are all simple consonants.
Each one is a one and only phoneme.
Last, Kotava is a soft language that has a vocalic rate
a bit superior to 50%. Moreover, the rule of
euphonic reference contributes to strengthen
its harmonious aspect.
2)
A phonetic language
Kotava is an
absolutely phonetic language, that is to say it is spelled like
it is pronounced and does not tolerate any exception.
Thus, for instance, in " feralia "
you distinguish the " i " from
the final " a " without making
a diphtongue. Or in " tcastaf "
the combined sound " tch ", which is expressed with a single
letter in some languages, is made by " t "
+ " c ".
As for the stressing,
Kotava adopted an extremely simple system. All the words with a final vowel
are stressed on the penultimate syllable. The others on the ultimate.
The only exception is that of the first person singular in the verbal
conjugation, which is stressed on the ultimate syllable despite of the
final vowel, analogically to the other verbal forms which have a final
consonant. Graphically, you can ute an accute stress to symbolize it.
3)
A rich, differenced and extensible lexicon
Kotava currently has a 17 000 radical lexicon,
covering pratically all the domains of human thought and expression, and allowing
elaborate shades.
But overall, Kotava is practically unlimitedly extensible. Indeed, its complete
system of affixing allows to derive dozens of new terms from a substantive,
a determinative or a verb, each one wearing a specific expression. There are
no limits to these possibilites, other than those of mutual understanding.
Ex. |
tawa |
(earth) |
|
Ø
tawak |
(animal's) hole) |
|
Ø
tawaxo |
(field) |
|
Ø
tawiskaf |
(earthless) |
|
Ø
tawolk |
(earth particle) |
|
Ø
tawopa |
(agronomy) |
Let's add to this the rules of
composition. Very powerful, they allow to generate new terms and
concepts by combining several lexemes.
4)
A simple and rigorous grammatical system
Kotava has a simple and easy to
apprehend grammatical system, which is very rigorous.
Here are the main features of this system :
-
Differenced
morphological forms.
A determiner, a verbal form or a substantive immediately
distinguishable. Even when totally isolated, a word can be
understood without precisions.
-
Invariability of nouns.
Kotava doesn't have any declension. Substantives and pronouns
are invariable and no particular mark of number is added to them.
-
Absence of gender. Kotava doesn't know any notion of
gender.
Thus, there are no male or female nouns. You can tell
that all words are neutral, and if you really want to
specify one's gender you just have to use gender suffixes
(« ye »
for males and « ya »
pour females).
-
Simple
verbal system.
Only 3 tenses : Present, Past and Future.
4 moods : Indicative, Imperative, Conditional,
Participle (or Relative).
-
Regular verbal conjugation. A unique type of conjugation
for all verbs, without exceptions, including 7 persons.
First, in a morphological point of view, every word can
immediately be recognized. Either it is a determinative,
a verbal form, an adverb or a substantive, there cannot be
any confusion or doubt. One of the advantages of this is
to allow a great syntaxical flexibility.
Thus, for instance, there is no imposed word order.
Although the most frequently used order is CSV
(complement - subject - verb) expressions of different
types are not rare.
All the complements must be introduced by a preposition.
You can use a great varety of them that answer all the
needs of the expressiveness. In Kotava, there are not
direct complements strictly speaking (corresponding to
the accusative case in declensive langages).
Object complements, or transitive complements, are introduce
by the transitive « va » preposition.
Thus, an isolated substantive or pronoun is inevitably
a subject predicate.
5)
A strong and unambiguous expressiveness
Kotava has a ric hand very
diversified vocabulary that allows all its speakers to always
be able to express any idea or sentence.
Each Kotava term carries an unique meaning, they are monosemic
in a way. Furthermore, there are no homonyms and therefore
never any ambguity. This monovalence of the words obviously
goes with a rich system of affixing
and composition
that allows to express the slightest subsleties, shades
and connected ideas. Kotava uses its possibilities a lot,
thanks to what it offers an almost unlimited creativeness
and flexibility.
About the verbal system, the nouns or the determinatives,
affixing rules are very simple and do not admit any exceptions.
Consequently, the speaker never faces any difficulty of
construction or understanding. The same way, great morphological
rigour of Kotava eliminates every ambiguity as for the type and
the role of each word in the sentence.
Basic radicals and the whole lexicon grow regularly,
in relation with the new fields of thought and expression that
appear in our modern societies. The inner mechanisms, the logics
and the own genius of the Kotava allows it to easily answer them
and to break new ground without difficulty. Let's bet that in
the end Kotava would be a driving force in the field of new
suggestions and developments which would be used by all the
other languages.
6)
A varied and flexible using
Kotava was featured to allow speakers with very different
thoughts and language systems , in one hand to understand
each other of course, but also to be able to express themselves
the most intuitive way possible, by using patterns of expression
and construction near to their mother language.
A few examples :
-
With Kotava, you can express direct speech as easily as
indirect speach, active, passive or relative propositions.
Ex.
- va
pruva Paul estur : (Paul is eating the apple) : direct speech.
-
gan Paul pruva zo estur :
(the apple is eaten by Paul) : indirect speech
-
Paul dan va pruva estur :
(Paul who is eating the apple) : relative speech
-
Paul va pruva estus : (Paul eating the apple) : active speech
-
pruvestus Paul : (Paul apple-eater) : determinative construction
- pruva estuna gan Paul :
(the apple eaten by Paul) : passive construction
-
pruva va dana Paul estur :
(the apple that Paul is eating) : relative construction
-
« Traditional sentences » with
CSV (complement -
subject - verb), or SVC, ou even SCV.
Ex.
- va
pruva Paul estur : (Paul is eating the apple) : CSV
-
Paul estur va pruva : (Paul is eating the apple) : SVC
-
Paul va pruva estur : (Paul is eating the apple) : SCV
-
va pruva estur Paul : (Paul is eating the apple) : CVS
-
Sentences with explicit subject and verb and those
with understood ones.
Ex.
-
batcoba tir listafa : (this is beautiful) :
explicit subject and verb
-
listafa
: (this is beautiful) : understood subject and verb
-
The
composition-agglutination
of determinatives and substantives or the segmentition of terms.
Ex.
-
fadxabilaga
: (coffee cup) : composition of 2 terms
-
bilaga tori fadxa : (coffee cup) : segmentation
-
The using or not of subject
personal pronouns.
Ex.
- va
pruva in estur : (he is eating the apple) : expressed personal pronoun
-
va pruva estur : (he is eating the apple)
: omited personal pronoun
-
Undifferenced genders or using of
gender suffixes.
Ex.
-
jagadesik : (business manager) : indifferenced gender
- jagadesikya : (business manager) : female gender
-
jagadesikye : (business manager) : male gender
A Chinese speaker will be susceptible to the invariability of words.
A Turkish or Finnish speaker will be totally at ease with the affixing principles.
A German speaker will find in the composition principles well-known features.
An English speaker will certainly work the flexibility of syntaxical constructions.
A French speaker will enjoy shaded Cartesian constructions allowed by the language.
KOTAVA : MAIN
ORIGINALITIES
Kotava has some particular features that make of it an
original and very coherent system :
-
transitivity by preposition
-
plural by meaning
-
linking conjunctions
-
locative prepositions
-
the 4th person plural
-
the complete imperative mood
-
the 3 tenses of the verb
-
the 10 aspects of the verb
-
the 5 states of the verb
-
the 7 modalties of the verb
-
the verbs of movement
-
the serial pronouns
-
the euphonic reference
7)
Transitivity by preposition
In most declensive languages, complements of object are expressed
by the accusative case. In non-flexional languages, they are
mostly rendered direcly (hence their name of direct complements
of object), generally using their place in the sentence.
By difference, in Kotava those complements are called "transitive"
since they are introduced by transitive verbs
and must be introduced by the transitive preposition « va ».
Ex.
va
pruva Paul estur is translated by (Paul is eating an apple)
and is analyzed the following way :
- va pruva :
(an apple) as a transitive complement
- Paul :
(Paul) the subject of the sentence
- estur :
(eats, is eating) the verb, in the present 3rd person singular
With this principle, the place
in the sentence is minor in Kotava.The order above, CSV,
is the most classical one, but any other unambiguous order
is possible.
8)
Plural by meaning
In Kotava, substantives
and pronouns are invariable and do not get any specific
plural mark. Plural is expressed by context, either by
conjugation or by the using of plural-meaning determinatives.
Ex.
bat
listaf batakaf okol vulted
(these beautiful white horses are running)
- the 3rd person plural mark « -d »
indicates unambiguously the plural feature of the subject predicate
9)
Linking conjunctions
Kotava has twelve
linking conjunctions that play an important part
and, overall were featured in such a way they offer un great
flexibility and a great accuracy in expression, with an
extraordinary conciseness.
is,
ise, isu |
(and) |
ok,
oke, oku |
(or) |
ik,
ike, iku |
(and/or) |
mei,
meie,meiu |
(neither, nor) |
vols,
volse, volsu |
(but not, opposition) |
az,
aze, azu |
(then) |
vox,
voxe, voxu |
(nevertheless, but) |
num,
nume, numu |
(thus) |
kir,
kire, kiru |
(because) |
lodam,
lodame, lodamu |
(rather than) |
lidam,
lidame, lidamu |
(as well as) |
ledam,
ledame, ledamu |
(failing..., otherwise) |
Simple conjunctive forms are used in a simple linking,
within the same proposition.
Ex : va
atela is ilt sin estud
(their are eating meat and fruit)
va
Paris vols London in albar
(he likes Paris but not London)
The
« -e »
forms are used out of precise listings and link different
propositions.
Ex :
karvol estur ise ulir
(the cat is eating and drinking)
va Paris in albar
volse va London akler
(he likes Paris but he hates London)
The « -u »
forms are called "distributive". In a simple proposition,
if various terms are qualified by the same determinatives,
they allow to avoid repetitions and to "distribute" those
determinatives. Thus the determinatives that qualify the
first term are also applied to the following terms linked
by a "-u" conjunction.
Ex : listaf
batakaf karvol isu vakol isu okol vulted
(the beautiful white cat, the beautiful white dog and the beautiful white horse are running)
The determinatives
« listaf »
(beautiful) and « batakaf »
(white) are applied to the three linked substantives.
10)
Locative prepositions
The 53
locative prepositions of the Kotava play
important parts. And overall make up an original group,
that allows to express all the desirable shades in matter
of moving and positioning in space.
Each locative preposition actually has four distinctive
forms, all constructed on the same logic :
-
Form n° 1 : it expresses the
place where you go.
It constitutes the basic form on which the three
others are constructed.
-
Form n° 2 : it expresses the
place where you are.
It is constructed on the principle : form n° 1 +
« e ».
-
Form n° 3 : it expresses the place from where
you come.
It is constructed on the principle : form n° 1 +
« u ».
-
Form n° 4 : it expresses the place through
where you go.
It is constructed on the principle : form n° 1 +
« o ».
Ex. |
ko |
(in, to) (with. mov.) |
mo |
(on) (with mov.) |
|
Ø
koe |
(in) (without mov.) |
Ø
moe |
(on) (without mov.) |
|
Ø
kou |
(from) |
Ø
mou |
(from above) |
|
Ø
koo |
(by) |
Ø
moo |
(through above) |
11)
The 4th person plural
Kotava uses a 4th
person
plural, unknown in most of the other languages, that covers
an exclusive "we". In English, the "we" expresses two different
ideas. In Kotava, you can see two persons and two differenced
pronouns : « min »
and « cin ».
« Min »
is the 1st person plural that he represents
have an inclusive meaning, that is to say the speaker
includes in the "we" the person or the people to whom
he is talking. On the contrary, "cin" (th person plural)
is exclusive - the interlocutor or locutors are excluded of it.
Ex.
min
betlize kenubeyet
(we slept anywhere). The interlocutor is included in the "we"
cin
betlize kenubeyev
(we slept anywhere). The person I am talking to is not concerned
12)
The Imperatif, complete mood
In Kotava,
contrary to numerous other languages, the Imperative
is a complete mood and has in particular all the persons
and tenses. It can also be used with every meaning, aspect
and state. It is only quite incompatible with the uncertain
state (as for the meaning at least).
The Imperative mood is based on the Indicative,
with some differences :
ke ! |
(I
must wait !, wait !) (talking to myself) |
kel
! |
(wait !) |
ker
! |
(he must wait !) |
ket
! |
(let us wait !) |
kec
! |
(wait !) |
ked
! |
(they must wait !) |
kev ! |
(let us wait !) |
13)
The tenses of the verb
Kotava only
uses three
tenses : present, past, future.
-
The Present
expresses that an action is occuring at
the moment of the enunciation. It is also used to
indicate that an action happens frequently, usually.
-
The
Past expresses accomplished actions.
-
The Future expresses that an
action will occur, with few doubts on it.
All the other shades
rendered in other languages by other tenses or compound
ones are often expressed by the meaning or the aspects.
Past and future are constructed by specific suffixes that
are added to the verbal radical (with a basis
« -y »
for the Past and « -t »
for the Future). There is no exception.
Ex.
in
dankar (he sings)
in dankayar (he sang)
in dankatar (he will sing)
14)
The 10 aspects of the verb
Next to the three tenses, Kotava has, in order to decline
all the time notions, an original system which is called
aspects. Ten aspects exist :
-
The
Simple Durative. It is the implicit meaning of
a verb. It expresses that the action of the verb lasts
for a certain time.
-
The Progressive.
It indicates that an action is running, currently,
in the past or in the future.
It uses the invariable preposed particle «
dun ».
-
the Continuous.
It indicates that the action continues, continued
or will continue to run. It is still in progress.
It uses the invariable preposed particle «
wan ».
-
The Anterior.
It indicates, preserving the basic durative notion,
that an action occurs, occured or will occur right before
another one, which is in a way something subordinate to it.
It uses the invariable preposed particle «
al ».
-
The
Later. Opposite to the anterior,
indicates an action that occurs, occured or will occur right
after and in relation with another one.
It uses the invariable preposed particle «
di ».
-
The Instantaneous.
It indicates that, contrary to the basic durative
notion, the verbal action ends in an instant, it is just
a dot in time.
It uses the invariable preposed particle «
ve ».
-
The Linked
Perfect. It indicates that an action has, had
or will have just occured, without the notion of
subordination with another action of the anterior.
It uses the invariable preposed particle «
su ».
-
The Linked
Future. Opposite to the linked future.
It indicates that an action is, was or will be going
to occur, like above without subordinating notion.
It uses the invariable preposed particle «
fu ».
-
The Inchoative.
It indicates that an action begins, began or will
begin to occur.
It uses the invariable preposed particle «
toz ».
-
The
Terminative. Opposite to
the inchoative. It indicates that an action is, was or
will be going to end.
It uses the invariable preposed particle «
ten ».
15)
The 5 States of the verb
Kotava have five
states :
-
The
Positive. It is the normal, usual state, that
merely indicates an action is occuring. The positive
state is understood and doesn't have any specific mark.
-
The Affirmative.
It is a strengthened positive that insists on the
occuring of the action. Notion of 'really'.
It uses the adverb « en »,
which alone means « yes ».
-
The Unsettled. It is the notion of the 'maybe', the possible
It uses the adverb « rotir »
(maybe).
-
The Negative. The action does not occur,
without a particular insistance.
It uses the adverbs « me »,
« mea » and
« men »,
(not, not ... anymore, not ... yet).
-
The Oppositive. It is opposed to the affirmative.
The action does not occur and everything is precisely
done so that it does not.
It uses the adverb « vol »
(roughly 'on the contrary').
16)
The 7 modalties of the verb
Kotava has an
original modalties system, which allows to express for
every verb notions that are often rendered by separate
and complexe constructions in other languages. There are
six
modalties :
-
The Effective.
The effective. It is the main modalties of a verb.
It is understood and does not bear any specific mark.
A basic verbal form will always be in the effective.
It indicates what is occuring basically.
It exists in all the verbal forms by definition.
-
The
Possibilitive.
It is the modalty which expresses that an action may
occur, that it is possible.
It exists in all the verbal forms and uses prefix on
the verbal radical « ro
(t
)-
».
-
The Obligative. It indicates that the action must
be done, that it is necessary
It exists in all the verbal forms and uses prefix on
the verbal radical « go
(n
)-
».
-
The Abilitive. It indicates that you are able to do something.
It exists in all the verbal forms and uses prefix on
the verbal radical « gru
(p
)-
».
-
The Willing. It is the modalty which indicates
that you want to do an action.
Toutes les formes verbales sont susceptibles d’être
affectées de la modalité volitive.
It exists in all the verbal forms and uses prefix on
the verbal radical « dju
(m
)-
».
-
The Usual. It is the modalty which indicates
that you are used to doing something.
It exists in all the verbal forms and uses prefix on
the verbal radical « gi
(l
)-
».
-
The Absolutive. It is the modalty which indicates
that an action or a fact is something constant,
especially physical truthes or scientific premises.
It exists in all the verbal forms and uses prefix on
the verbal radical « so
(k
)-
».
17)
The Movement verbs
In Kotava, some verbs called
movement verbs,
can be made up with any locative preposition (in any form).
This way, all kinds of subtleties and precisions you can
think of can be expressed.
Those made up verbs become transitive and thus build
their object complements by the preposition « va ».
The locative idea remains fully contained in the
preverbalised preposition.
Ex :
va mona jin kolaní
(I go into the house)
va mona jin koelaní
(I come and go in the house)
va widava in remtalar
(he flies through the town)
va widava in remetalar
(he flies all over town)
in malvulter
(he runs away)
18)
The serial pronouns
In Kotava,
there are 85 relative or other pronouns (demonstrative,
collective, undefined, etc.), 60 of which are in
pronominal series.
These are based on a compound relative pronoun and a composer
(on the same principle as relative adverbial series).
The compounds are :
coba |
(what) |
tan |
(one, the one)(unknown) |
tel |
(one, the one)(known) |
tol |
(one of the two) |
The composers are :
bat |
(this) |
Near demonstrative |
ban |
(that) |
Far demonstrative |
mil |
(same) |
Demonstrative of equality |
ar |
(other) |
Alternative |
kot |
(all, every) |
Collective |
me |
(none, zero) |
Negative |
kon |
(some) |
Near undefined |
bet |
(any) |
Far undefined |
lan |
(a certain) |
Simple undefined |
man |
(such a) |
Precise undefined |
yon |
(a number of) |
Plural undefined |
abic |
(few) |
Undefined little number |
konak |
(several) |
Undefined medium number |
jontik |
(many, much) |
Undefined high number |
slik |
(too many, too much) |
Undefined excess |
dik |
(not enough) |
Undefined insufficiency |
um |
(enough) |
Undefined sufficiency |
le |
(less) |
Inferiority quantifier |
li |
(as many, as much) |
Equality quantifier |
lo |
(more) |
Superiority quantifier |
tok ? |
(which ?, what ?) |
Direct interrogative |
kas ? |
(is there ?) |
Interrogative of existence |
Ex :
batcoba
(this)
bancoba
(that)
kotcoba
(everything)
kontel
(someone) (known)
bettan
(anyone) (unknown)
toktol
? (which of the two ?)
19)
The euphonic reference
Although Kotava
does not have any notion of genders, which would for example
depend on a termination, the « euphonic reference »
rule plays a large part.
All the determinatives (adjectives, articles, numerals and
participles), the possessive pronouns and total suffixes
are indeed submitted to this rule. It states that these
must euphonically match the substantive to which they refer ;
that is to say having a similar euphonic termination. This way :
-
A
substantive (or pronoun) with a final consonant
or semi-vowel will imply a determinative, possessive pronoun
or total suffix with termination zero (necessarily a consonant)
-
A
substantive (or pronoun) with a final
« -a »
è
desinence « -a »
-
A
substantive (or pronoun) with a final
« -e »
è
desinence « -e »
-
A
substantive (or pronoun) with a final
« -i »
è
desinence « -i »
-
A
substantive (or pronoun) with a final
« -o »
è
desinence « -o »
-
A
substantive (or pronoun) with a final
« -u »
è
desinence « -u »
Ex : listaf patctoy (a beautiful landscape)
baroye blujte (three clothes)
bati sveri
(this bird)
Beside the strenghening in Kotava's harmony, this rule
also allows to unambiguously express syntaxical constructions
which are sometimes complex. The euphonic termination is
in a way a relative pointer that clearly send to the predicate
that the determinative represents.
Ex : listafa mona poke
savsafe iaxe vegeduyuna bak 1840 va dotagadesik
ware dulapar
(the Mayor is still interessed by the beautiful house near the old factory build in 1840)
Thanks to the "a" termination, we can say without a doubt
it is the house (mona) that was built (vegeduyuna) in 1840,
not the factory (iaxe).
|